Liquidity rails for OTC event swaps on tail risks.
- Participants
- ECPs and panels of institutional counterparties
- Underwriting
- Competitive RFQ and syndication
- Margin-free
- Fully collateralized
- Settlement
- On-chain escrow per n-of-1 contract
Marketplace
When the figure plays, institutional underwriters start scattered and three hedges look for them without finding a match. The marketplace then organizes the underwriters into three pools. For each hedge in turn, a competitive RFQ for its own bespoke n-of-1 smart contract goes to one pool. Every underwriter in the pool quotes; one quote leads and sets the price, two underwriters write follow-on lines at the lead’s price, and one declines. The next hedge, from another sector, then steps up.
Contract
In traditional markets, specialized risk clears through brokers who bring one-off exposures to underwriting marketplaces. Leads price the risk and take the largest single line, and follow-on parties subscribe capital at the lead’s price. Lloyd’s of London, catastrophe bonds, and merger arbitrage in the U.S. are examples of such systems.
DCM-based event markets today are designed to address such risks via crowd-sourced books, but fail to attract sufficient liquidity at the tails.
Martingale bridges the subscription market model to tail risk. We broker bespoke, fully collateralized event contracts as cash-settled swaps between ECPs and panels of institutional counterparties.
Key Resources
Event origination, RFQ, SDR filing, diversified portfolios, and collateralization.
Read the paperBrokered competition, lead-follow syndication, and collateralized capacity in the context of event risk.
Read the paper
Counterparties and incentive structure in our n-of-1 contracts.
Read the paper